“Every Artist needs a Web Site”. We read that and hear that
all the
time. But is a Web Site the right digital footprint for an Artist?
Maybe not.
When you think of Web Site, you think of consuming
information that is mostly static and doesn’t change very often. When you think
of Applications, you’re DOING something. Like desktop applications (Word,
Photoshop, Skype), Web Applications are dynamic and ever-changing. Web
applications rely on you to interact with them, whether by contributing content
or by gathering data from other sources and presenting it to you.
Now, think of how an Artist uses the internet:
·
Continually uploading content – music, videos,
photos
·
Continually communicating with Fans – Instagram,
Twitter, Facebook, Vine, etc.
·
Continually updating Show information
·
A desire to have regular engagement with Fans
The dynamic nature of the Artist to Fan relationship speaks
volumes to having a Web Application and not a Web Site. Where “Web Sites” end
and “Web Apps” begin. Compared to the classic web, i.e. blogs and news sites, Web
Apps provide a richer user experience and access to advanced browser
capabilities. But it’s more about the task
focus than the technology itself. The use case of an application is always
to DO something with it.
Also, how you use your Web App or Web Site is also
important. Since Web Sites are, for the most part, static and unchanging, it’s
OK to have fans find you. But with the dynamic nature of Web Apps, you want to
proactively drive your fans to your Web App because there is constantly
changing news and content.
No comments:
Post a Comment